Distinguishing between Different Syntactic Roles of Identical Words in Normal Reading: an ERP Study
نویسندگان
چکیده
Separating between semantic and syntactic aspects of language processing in the brain is a difficult task. In an attempt to distinguish between the two, many studies so far have measured responses to semantic or syntactic violations in reading comprehension tasks. However, this methodology may be inaccurate in describing semantic and syntactic processing during normal reading. In this study, we use a novel task, measuring responses to identical target words as they assume different syntactic roles. All sentences presented in the task are syntactically correct sentences without lexical-semantic anomalies. We present results from a behavioral experiment, testing the validity of the experimental design, and results from a pilot ERP study, measuring brain responses to the difference in the syntactic role of the target words. We conclude that the proposed design is valid and may be used to shed light on semantic and syntactic processing during language comprehension, in normal reading.
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Reducing Lexical and Syntactic Complexity of Texts on Reading Comprehension
The present study investigated the effect of different types of text simplification (i.e., reducing the lexical and syntactic complexity of texts) on reading comprehension of English as a Foreign Language learners (EFL). Sixty female intermediate EFL learners from three intact classes in Tabarestan Language Institute in Tehran participated in the study. The intact classes were assigned to three...
متن کاملERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.
In this study, event-related brain potential effects of speech processing are obtained and compared to similar effects in sentence reading. In two experiments sentences were presented that contained three different types of grammatical violations. In one experiment sentences were presented word by word at a rate of four words per second. The grammatical violations elicited a Syntactic Positive ...
متن کاملEFL Textbook Evaluation: An Analysis of Readability and Vocabulary Profiler of Four Corners Book Series
This study aimed to investigate whether there is any significant relationship between the readability and vocabulary profile including the most frequent words (K1 words) and academic word list (AWL) of reading passages of Four Corners series which were EFL textbooks. To determine the readability of the texts, the Flesch–Kincaid (1975) readability test was used, while the texts' academic word li...
متن کاملEFL Textbook Evaluation: An Analysis of Readability and Vocabulary Profiler of Four Corners Book Series
This study aimed to investigate whether there is any significant relationship between the readability and vocabulary profile including the most frequent words (K1 words) and academic word list (AWL) of reading passages of Four Corners series which were EFL textbooks. To determine the readability of the texts, the Flesch–Kincaid (1975) readability test was used, while the texts' academic word li...
متن کاملEvaluation of “Mosaic 1 Reading”: A Microstructural Approach to Textual Analysis of Pedagogical Materials
To analyze and evaluate textbooks, researchers have either proposed scales and checklists to be filled by teachers and learners or conducted qualitative investigations of the match between SLA theories and textbook activities. This study, however, employs the microstructural approach of schema theory to scrutinize the reading passages of “Mosaic 1 Reading”. To this end, 17 passages of the textb...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015